CVRs name Baird the Ranked Robin winner, paper elects Ames: evidence account

The contest

Title: CVRs name Baird the Ranked Robin winner, paper elects Ames

Candidates: Ames, Baird, Cortez.

Records in this count: 20.

Ballot file: condorcet-wrong-winner

Source: Synthetic fixture: committed CVRs all rank Baird first, simulated paper all rank Ames first.

The machine's reported Ranked Robin winner is Baird, who wins every matchup on the CVRs. A hand count of the paper would elect Ames. A comparison-form assertion audit at 10% risk must go to a full hand count.

Where the records sat:

One stack of 20 records. There is no ballot manifest of sealed containers.

No container custody was supplied.

What was configured

Configuration version: condorcet-wrong-winner-ranked-robin-v1-under-bridging.

Configuration fingerprint (SHA-256): 90a954f6b8dcf3bfeb96b411eb91e7d288662b44e34a8a0ec89782ee88d87e95.

Counting rule: the bridging rule.

Ballot rules used: Two or more marks at one rank end the ballot there; 2 ranks in a row left blank end the ballot; a candidate marked again lower down counts as a rank left blank.

Ballot file: condorcet-wrong-winner. A third party with this file can rerun the count.

Audit: none. No seed was used.

Configured audit risk limit: 10%.

Plain-language configuration (check against statute intent):

Configuration version: condorcet-wrong-winner-ranked-robin-v1-under-bridging

Fingerprint (SHA-256): 90a954f6b8dcf3bfeb96b411eb91e7d288662b44e34a8a0ec89782ee88d87e95

Election: A made-up three-candidate contest, machine records wrong, counted under bridging (approved across the room's differences)

A demonstration configuration over committed fixture records, counting the same ballots under another rule. No audit ran under it, and no real election was counted under it.

Contests and candidates:

A made-up three-candidate contest, machine records wrong (condorcet-wrong-winner): Ames; Baird; Cortez.

Counting rule: bridging (approved across the room's differences).

Tiebreak: not used under this counting rule.

Ballot rules (how marks become a ranking):

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

Audit risk limit: 10%. A risk-limiting audit that runs under this configuration stops when the sample confirms the outcome at that limit, or sends the contest to a full hand count.

How a ballot is counted and how an audit stops are fixed by this version. Changing any of the lines above requires a new version id.

The count

What follows is the counting account under the bridging rule, including every intermediate step.

The rule

1. Every answer is one ranking of the drafts. A draft a ranking does not name is ranked last on that ranking, level with every other draft it does not name.

2. Each pair of drafts is set against each other: how many rankings put the first above the second, and how many put it the other way. The pair whose smaller side is largest is the question the room divides on.

3. The room is split in two on that question: the rankings that put one of the two above the other, and the rankings that put it the other way round. A ranking with no preference between those two counts on both sides.

4. On each side, a draft's support is the share of that side's comparisons it wins. Each ranking on the side compares the draft with each other draft: above counts one, below counts nothing, no preference counts a half.

5. A draft's standing is its support on the side where it is weakest. The draft with the highest standing stands. If two drafts are level on it, nothing stands.

What was counted

Ballots in this count: 20.

Ballots from: Synthetic fixture: committed CVRs all rank Baird first, simulated paper all rank Ames first.

The machine's reported Ranked Robin winner is Baird, who wins every matchup on the CVRs. A hand count of the paper would elect Ames. A comparison-form assertion audit at 10% risk must go to a full hand count.

How the marks on a ballot were read:

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

The rankings the ballots form, and how many ballots form each. A candidate a ranking does not name is ranked last on those ballots.

The question the room divides on

Each pair of drafts, both ways round. The smaller side is the count on the side fewer rankings took, and the pair whose smaller side is largest is the question the room divides on.

No pair divided the room: every pair of drafts the rankings compared, they compared the same way.

The room

No pair of drafts divided the room, so the count runs on the room as one group: 20 rankings.

Points are the comparisons a draft wins on this side: above counts one, below counts nothing, no preference counts a half.

Support across the sides

A draft's standing is its support on the side where it is weakest.

What stands

Baird stands: its support on the side where it is weakest is 100.00%, higher than any other draft's.

Records with no mark, by contest and by machine

At the close of polls, the share of records with no mark in each contest, by contest and by machine. Leaving a contest blank is a voter's right; an outlier below is a question about the ballot or the machine, not a verdict.

The audit

No audit ran.

What was found

No audit ran, so there are no sample findings.

Custody: none supplied. No container custody chain was recorded or verified.

Why it stopped

Decision: no audit.

No audit ran.

Outcome status: preliminary. Software tallies stay preliminary until an audit on the record confirms them or a full hand count of the record replaces them.