This is a preliminary fixture, not a certified election.

CVRs name Baird the Ranked Robin winner, paper elects Ames: evidence account

In plain words

The count under instant runoff elected Baird because in round 1, 20 of the 20 ballots still counting counted for Baird, more than half.

No audit ran.

No container custody was supplied.

Outcome status: preliminary. Software tallies stay preliminary until an audit on the record confirms them or a full hand count of the record replaces them.

The contest

Title: CVRs name Baird the Ranked Robin winner, paper elects Ames

Candidates: Ames, Baird, Cortez.

Records in this count: 20.

Ballot file: condorcet-wrong-winner

Source: Synthetic fixture: committed CVRs all rank Baird first, simulated paper all rank Ames first.

The machine's reported Ranked Robin winner is Baird, who wins every matchup on the CVRs. A hand count of the paper would elect Ames. A comparison-form assertion audit at 10% risk must go to a full hand count.

Where the records sat:

One stack of 20 records. There is no ballot manifest of sealed containers.

No container custody was supplied.

What was configured

Configuration version: condorcet-wrong-winner-ranked-robin-v1-under-instant-runoff.

Configuration fingerprint (SHA-256): 3056ce6d8b6d62d1ab2eb8229c2abd4e86f6b4530a68673bef44b15ec3f1726c.

Counting rule: instant runoff.

Ballot rules used: Two or more marks at one rank end the ballot there; 2 ranks in a row left blank end the ballot; a candidate marked again lower down counts as a rank left blank.

Ballot file: condorcet-wrong-winner. A third party with this file can rerun the count.

Audit: none. No seed was used.

Configured audit risk limit: 10%.

Plain-language configuration (check against statute intent):

Configuration version: condorcet-wrong-winner-ranked-robin-v1-under-instant-runoff

Fingerprint (SHA-256): 3056ce6d8b6d62d1ab2eb8229c2abd4e86f6b4530a68673bef44b15ec3f1726c

Election: A made-up three-candidate contest, machine records wrong, counted under instant runoff

A demonstration configuration over committed fixture records, counting the same ballots under another rule. No audit ran under it, and no real election was counted under it.

Contests and candidates:

A made-up three-candidate contest, machine records wrong (condorcet-wrong-winner): Ames; Baird; Cortez.

Counting rule: instant runoff.

Tiebreak: not used under this counting rule.

Ballot rules (how marks become a ranking):

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

Audit risk limit: 10%. A risk-limiting audit that runs under this configuration stops when the sample confirms the outcome at that limit, or sends the contest to a full hand count.

How a ballot is counted and how an audit stops are fixed by this version. Changing any of the lines above requires a new version id.

The count

What follows is the counting account under instant runoff, including every intermediate step.

What was counted

Ballots in this count: 20.

Ballots from: Synthetic fixture: committed CVRs all rank Baird first, simulated paper all rank Ames first.

The machine's reported Ranked Robin winner is Baird, who wins every matchup on the CVRs. A hand count of the paper would elect Ames. A comparison-form assertion audit at 10% risk must go to a full hand count.

How the marks on a ballot were read:

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

The rankings the ballots form, and how many ballots form each. A candidate a ranking does not name is ranked last on those ballots.

RankingBallots
Baird > Ames > Cortez20

Round 1

CandidateVotesShare
Baird20100.00%
Ames00.00%
Cortez00.00%

Ballots counting this round: 20.

Ballots counting for nobody: no candidate marked 0; ran out of rankings 0; two or more marks at one rank 0.

More than half of 20 is 11.

Baird has 20 votes, more than half of 20, and is elected.

Outcome

Baird is elected: after 1 round, 20 of the 20 ballots still counting rank Baird above every candidate left.

Records with no mark, by contest and by machine

At the close of polls, the share of records with no mark in each contest, by contest and by machine. Leaving a contest blank is a voter's right; an outlier below is a question about the ballot or the machine, not a verdict.

ContestRecordsWith no markShare
condorcet-wrong-winner2000.00%

The audit

No audit ran.

What was found

No audit ran, so there are no sample findings.

Custody: none supplied. No container custody chain was recorded or verified.

Why it stopped

Decision: no audit.

No audit ran.

Outcome status: preliminary. Software tallies stay preliminary until an audit on the record confirms them or a full hand count of the record replaces them.