Ames 60 percent, one row per ballot: evidence account

The contest

Title: Ames 60 percent, one row per ballot

Candidates: Ames, Baird.

Records in this count: 500.

Ballot file: comparison-cvrs

Source: Synthetic committed CVRs for the Lindeman and Stark 2012 comparison example (diluted margin 20%).

300 ballots mark Ames first, 200 mark Baird first. Each row is one physical ballot. Paper rankings are omitted, so they match the committed CVRs. This is a fixture, not a sealed container.

Where the records sat:

One stack of 500 records. There is no ballot manifest of sealed containers.

No container custody was supplied.

What was configured

Configuration version: comparison-cvrs-custody-gap-plurality-v1-under-borda.

Configuration fingerprint (SHA-256): e19904f538e8c4cb81bffa9c104ce6d1f86a2dd17855e72989d117c341597293.

Counting rule: Borda.

Ballot rules used: Two or more marks at one rank end the ballot there; 2 ranks in a row left blank end the ballot; a candidate marked again lower down counts as a rank left blank.

Ballot file: comparison-cvrs. A third party with this file can rerun the count.

Audit: none. No seed was used.

Configured audit risk limit: 10%.

Plain-language configuration (check against statute intent):

Configuration version: comparison-cvrs-custody-gap-plurality-v1-under-borda

Fingerprint (SHA-256): e19904f538e8c4cb81bffa9c104ce6d1f86a2dd17855e72989d117c341597293

Election: Ames 60 percent, three boxes whose custody does not hold, counted under Borda

A demonstration configuration over committed fixture records, counting the same ballots under another rule. No audit ran under it, and no real election was counted under it.

Contests and candidates:

Ames 60 percent, three boxes whose custody does not hold (comparison-cvrs): Ames; Baird.

Counting rule: Borda.

Tiebreak: not used under this counting rule.

Ballot rules (how marks become a ranking):

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

Audit risk limit: 10%. A risk-limiting audit that runs under this configuration stops when the sample confirms the outcome at that limit, or sends the contest to a full hand count.

How a ballot is counted and how an audit stops are fixed by this version. Changing any of the lines above requires a new version id.

The count

What follows is the counting account under Borda, including every intermediate step.

What was counted

Ballots in this count: 500.

Ballots from: Synthetic committed CVRs for the Lindeman and Stark 2012 comparison example (diluted margin 20%).

300 ballots mark Ames first, 200 mark Baird first. Each row is one physical ballot. Paper rankings are omitted, so they match the committed CVRs. This is a fixture, not a sealed container.

How the marks on a ballot were read:

Two or more marks at one rank: the ballot counts up to that rank and no further.

A candidate marked again lower down: that rank counts as a rank left blank.

2 ranks in a row left blank: the ballot counts up to there and no further.

A mark for anyone not on the ballot: a mark, so the rank is not blank, but never a vote.

The rankings the ballots form, and how many ballots form each. A candidate a ranking does not name is ranked last on those ballots.

The count

Each ballot gives 2 points to a candidate alone in first place, 1 to alone in second, and so on down to 1. Candidates who share a rank take the average of those places. Candidates a ballot does not name share last place.

Borda points cast: 1,500.

Ames is elected with 800 Borda points, more than any other candidate.

Records with no mark, by contest and by machine

At the close of polls, the share of records with no mark in each contest, by contest and by machine. Leaving a contest blank is a voter's right; an outlier below is a question about the ballot or the machine, not a verdict.

The audit

No audit ran.

What was found

No audit ran, so there are no sample findings.

Custody: none supplied. No container custody chain was recorded or verified.

Why it stopped

Decision: no audit.

No audit ran.

Outcome status: preliminary. Software tallies stay preliminary until an audit on the record confirms them or a full hand count of the record replaces them.